Disclaimer:

This blog entry is provided for academic and professional discussion only. The views expressed are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of the NHS, the author’s employing organization, or any affiliated professional bodies.

No patient‑identifiable information or confidential material is included. The content complies with the Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC) Code (2018) and NMC Social Media Guidance (2019) with respect to confidentiality, professionalism, and online conduct.

Let’s get to it then:

This entry examines the forthcoming industrial action by doctors in postgraduate training posts in England (hereafter “postgrad doctors,” historically termed junior doctors).

It integrates labour economics, public finance, workforce planning, and health‑services operations to evaluate:

(i) underlying drivers;

(ii) timing;

(iii) Government pay offers and framing;

(iv) fiscal arithmetic (“do the numbers add up?”);

(v) labour‑market and job‑security implications; and

(vi) short‑term operational issues relevant to advanced nurse practitioners and service leads—including upper GI surgical pathways—during strike week.

Historical Pay Context & Metrics Debate

The BMA argues that real earnings for postgrad doctors in England have fallen by ~21% since 2008 when deflated by the Retail Prices Index (RPI); its restoration ask—now framed as a 29% multi‑year uplift path—seeks to close that erosion.

Government counters that recent substantial cash‑terms awards (22% multi‑year settlement accepted in 2024 under the previous administration plus a further ~5.4% 2025/26 uplift) materially improved take‑home pay, and that RPI overstates inflation relative to CPI/CPIH. Methodological choice (RPI vs CPI vs CPIH) and baseline year (2008 vs 2015) profoundly change the real‑terms narrative: Nuffield Trust analysis cited by the Guardian shows a 4.7% fall (CPI, 2008 baseline) versus growth if a 2015 baseline is used.

Pay trajectory detail. Wes Streeting has stated resident/junior doctor pay rose 28.9% over three years, driven by the 2023–24 strike settlement (average 22% over two years) plus the 5.4% award for 2025/26; the BMA disputes adequacy relative to cumulative inflation.

Immediate Triggers of the July 2025 Action

The July 25–30 stoppage follows stalled talks after Government signalled no further movement on pay beyond the May 2025 settlement; the BMA gave two weeks’ notice seeking a “credible path to pay restoration.”

Dissatisfaction persists over rota gaps, unsocial hours, high burnout, debt burden, and perceived inequity versus other OECD destinations attracting UK‑trained doctors.

High reliance on international medical graduates (≈42% of doctors in the English NHS held a non‑UK primary medical qualification in 2023) underscores retention pressures.

Why Now? Strategic Timing & Political Economy

Pay round sequencing. The 2025/26 pay award was confirmed in May; postgrad doctors view renewed action as leverage before implementation and ahead of broader workforce settlement politics (consultants also dissatisfied with a 4% award).

Macro fiscal backdrop. Public finances remain tight; ministers are simultaneously pushing agency‑spend reductions (~£1bn cut reported for 2024/25) to release headroom. Industrial action re‑emerges as the Government attempts visible fiscal discipline, increasing bargaining salience.

Inflation optics. CPI/CPIH are now trending close to target but forecast to blip higher (~3% mid‑2025), giving both sides rhetorical ammunition: unions point to accumulated historic loss; Government points to moderating current inflation limiting need for large catch‑up.

Government Offer(s) in Play

2025/26 Pay Award

Government accepted Pay Review Body recommendations: c. 5.4% average uplift for resident (junior) doctors, with 4% for consultants and some other groups, backdated to April 2025 for relevant grades.

Pension/Reward Rebalancing Discussion

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has publicly floated willingness to rebalance current pay vs future pension generosity—NHS employer pension contributions are ~23.7%—should doctors’ representatives prefer cash‑in‑hand over deferred benefits.

The BMA has rejected trading pension value for salary, arguing pay erosion has already reduced lifetime pension accrual. From a labour economics perspective, younger cohorts with liquidity constraints often discount deferred compensation more heavily; rebalancing could change recruitment/retention margins but risks inter‑cohort equity disputes.

Non‑Pay Levers

Parallel DHSC and NHS England actions on agency‑spend controls, rostering reform, and workforce expansion (Long Term Workforce Plan) are positioned as structural responses to staffing strain—potential negotiating chips bundled with pay.

Do the Numbers Add Up? Illustrative Cost Model

Two archetypal cost lenses dominate discourse: gross wage‑bill impact (Treasury/DHSC) vs net fiscal impact after taxation, NI, and offsetting savings from reduced agency/locum dependence and improved retention (union/think‑tank framing).

Earlier dispute modelling around a larger 35% restoration produced ~£2bn+ gross vs ~£1bn net annual cost estimates (DHSC vs BMA), per Full Fact synthesis; scaling proportional to a 29% ask (and updating pay base post recent awards) implies order‑of‑magnitude £1.5–2.5bn gross range, depending on workforce size, incremental spine‑point effects, and employer on‑costs (~NI, 14%+) and pensions (23.7%).

Net exchequer cost narrows when recycling tax receipts and reduced temporary staffing outlays: agency spend in England fell ~£1bn 2024/25 under clampdown, highlighting the fiscal space tied up in premium temporary cover that could, in theory, be reallocated to baseline pay if sustained.

Illustrative arithmetic (stylised)

Suppose aggregate pensionable pay for doctors in training grades ~£7bn (illustrative midpoint triangulated from historic NHS Digital earnings series scaled by recent % uplifts; actual current ledger required for precision).

A further 20% real‑terms catch‑up staged over, say, 3 years equates to ~£1.4bn cumulative cash addition before behavioral offsets; annualized marginal in‑year effect depends on phasing.

Even partial restoration (e.g., 10% additional consolidated uplift) would run ~£700m gross. Offsets: 30% reduction in high‑premium locum/agency junior doctor shifts across affected specialties could reclaim significant, though not fully fungible, funds; widely cited examples of >£1k premium shifts show high marginal cost of gaps.

Interpretive caution

True budget effect must incorporate: banding differentials; LTFT (less‑than‑full‑time) patterns; training grade mix shifts from workforce expansion; and potential pension smoothing if reward rebalancing pursued.

Labour Market Dynamics & Job Security for Postgrad Doctors

Burnout & Training Environment

GMC National Training Survey 2025: 20% of trainees at high risk of burnout (double 2019); higher in Emergency Medicine (30%) and O&G (63% reporting heavy workload). Burnout correlates with attrition intent and training discontinuity—key job‑security signals when workforce pipelines depend on progression to specialty certification.

Generational Motivation & Pay Dissatisfaction

Nuffield Trust analysis of NHS Staff Survey data shows younger staff (which include most trainees) report lower job satisfaction and greater dissatisfaction with pay relative to older cohorts—suggesting elevated mobility risk if bargaining outcomes disappoint.

International Mobility & Replacement

Guardian data analysis reports significant outward migration of UK‑trained doctors to higher‑pay jurisdictions (Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Canada) while the English NHS increasingly relies on internationally qualified doctors (42% of 2023 NHS doctor workforce). Mobility options temper perceived job insecurity domestically but increase systemic insecurity (i.e., risk of domestic training investment leakage).

Macro Workforce Gap

The NHS Long Term Workforce Plan estimates an initial shortfall of ~150,000 FTE across staff groups, projected to 260k–360k by 2036/37 absent intervention; sustained training throughput and retention of postgrad doctors are pivotal to narrowing that gap.

System & Operational Implications (with Upper GI Surgical Lens)

Evidence from previous strike waves: prolonged junior doctor action contributed to >1m appointment re‑schedules and significant elective disruption; NHS leaders warn renewed strikes could derail waiting‑time recovery targets (18‑week RTT by 2029) and trigger further cross‑group unrest (nursing unions watching closely).

Potential implications for my Upper GI role:

• Theatre triage: Expect de‑prioritisation of benign elective laparoscopic procedures; cancer pathways may proceed if consultant + scrub + anaesthetic cover secured; check trust strike guidance bulletins. (Operational judgement; aligns with prior strike comms patterns.)
• Workload shift to ANPs/ACPs: Nurse practitioners frequently absorb ward‑based prescribing via protocols or PGDs where locally authorised; ensure governance clarity to avoid scope drift. (Professional practice guidance extrapolated.)
• Patient communication: Use standardised scripts referencing BMA and Trust advice to reduce reputational risk; align with local comms referencing national strike dates.
• Data capture: Log cancellations and adverse events; these data often used in post‑action negotiations over staffing models and escalation protocols.

Pros & Cons Summary by Stakeholder

Postgrad Doctors

Pro: Pay restoration may improve retention, reduce multiple locum shifts, and enhance wellbeing in high‑burnout specialties. 

Con: Escalation to strikes risks public goodwill erosion and lost earnings during action; long disputes create training disruption affecting exam readiness.

Government / DHSC

Pro: Holding line on pay (modest 5.4% award) supports fiscal control amid wider NHS deficits and demonstrates consistency with pay‑review processes. 

Con: Insufficient settlement may perpetuate agency reliance and turnover, undermining medium‑term cost‑containment goals (agency cut drive indicates scale).

NHS Employers / Service Delivery

Pro: Structured, staged settlement could provide predictability for workforce planning (Long Term Workforce Plan alignment). 

Con: Recurrent strike waves cause elective backlogs and scheduling inefficiency; staff redeployment costs escalate.

Patients & Public

Pro: If dispute resolution yields better staffed rotas, long‑run care quality may improve; reduced reliance on expensive agency shifts could redirect funds to services. 

Con: Immediate strike‑week cancellations, longer waits, and repeated disruption erode trust; prior waves saw large numbers of deferred appointments.

Wider Public Finances

Pro: Rebalancing pension accrual toward current pay could increase take‑home for liquidity‑constrained trainees without materially raising long‑run liabilities if calibrated. 

Con: Trading away defined‑benefit value risks future recruitment to senior grades and may ultimately raise agency/supplemental costs.

Conclusion: Negotiation Space

A binary 29% vs 5.4% framing obscures scope for multi‑element settlements:

(1) staged consolidated uplifts tied to inflation triggers;

(2) targeted enhancements in high‑attrition specialties;

(3) cashable commitments to rota safety ratios linked to agency reduction savings;

(4) optional pension‑to‑pay flex windows for early‑career cohorts;

(5) joint monitoring of burnout indices (GMC survey metrics) as conditionality for further uplifts.

For local leaders—including advanced nurse practitioners in surgical specialties—the priority in the immediate term is operational resilience: confirm escalation cover, protect cancer lists, and communicate transparently with patients citing the nationally declared 25–30 July action.

References

British Medical Association (2025) Resident doctors announce strike action in England. BMA Media Centre, 9 July. Available at: BMA (accessed 14 July 2025).

Department of Health and Social Care (2024) DHSC evidence for the DDRB: pay round 2025 to 2026. Policy paper, 10 Dec (updated 12 Dec). GOV.UK.

Department of Health and Social Care (2025) NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: doctors and dentists. Correspondence, 22 May. GOV.UK.

Full Fact (2023) ‘Would a 35% pay uplift for junior doctors cost £1 billion or £2 billion?’, 17 May. FullFact.org.

General Medical Council (2025) National Training Survey 2025 results. GMC, July.

Goodier, M. (2025) ‘Crunching the data: are resident doctors in England badly paid?’ 12 Jul. The Guardian.

Campbell, D. (2025) ‘NHS bosses fear fresh resident doctors’ strikes could embolden other staff’, 8 Jul. The Guardian.

Walker, P. (2025) ‘Spending on agency staff across NHS in England drops by almost £1bn’, 2 Jun. The Guardian.

Office for Budget Responsibility (2025) Inflation: March 2025 Economic and Fiscal Outlook detail. OBR, 21 May.

Office for National Statistics (2025) Inflation and price indices: CPI/CPIH/RPI datasets. ONS Statistical Bulletin, 16 Jul.

Reuters (2025) ‘Junior doctors in England announce five-day strike over pay demand’, 9 Jul. Reuters Health News.

Nixon, G. (2025) quoting Wes Streeting. ‘Wes Streeting open to cutting doctor pensions to fund pay rises’, 11 Jul. The Times.

NHS England (2023, accessed 2025) NHS Long Term Workforce Plan. NHS England Long Read.

Batty, D. (2025) ‘Are BMA calculations that resident doctors need a 29% pay rise credible?’, 9 Jul. The Guardian.